writing

Ozymandias is still a jerk

Chances are, if you’re a writer–professional, aspiring, tech, vengeful–you don’t need another reason to despair.  The economy stinks, publishing is pretty selective, agents are harder to come by, the ice caps are melting and soon polar bears will be moving down into your neighborhood to do the writing jobs and the herring they work for is at a premium.  Yes, things can be pretty gloomy.

So you don’t really need to read this piece here from an anonymous midlist author expounding on why it can (and frequently does) suck to be an author.  You could compare salaries, you could identify with her envy complex with books by other authors, you could sympathize with her lack of jobs and still feel slightly enraged for her bringing this upon you when you didn’t need it.

And if you read it, you probably will.  I can’t say I was immune to the despair that crept over me.

Being an author is sometimes like being back in high school.

No, not in the sense that there are people waiting to stuff you in lockers.  I’ve never been anything but aggressively honest when I say that there has never been a non-supportive author or peer in this industry.  Everyone remembers what it’s like, everyone remembers how hard it is and everyone wants you to succeed.

Nor in the sense that there are superiors that you privately resent.  Your editors definitely are invested in your success and frequently in you as a person.  And if I ever called my editors Mr. Spanton or Mr. Anders, they’d probably look at me real weird and then maybe push me down a flight of stairs.

Rather, being an author is occasionally like high school in that you instantly become the same insecure, crackly-voiced soothsayer who divines omens in coincidence, conspiracy in misfortune and crisis in the natural passage of time.  Thoughts of “is she prettier than me,” “does he think he’s bigger than me,” “have their pubes come in yet” rather swiftly turns to “does she have foreign-rights deals,” “does he think his twitter followers makes him more important,” “oh my god, they definitely got pubes now.”

I exaggerate.

But not by a lot.

The truth is that writing, especially professional writing, is unnervingly like going through puberty again.  You’re embarking on something that’s entirely new to you.  It’s slightly less sweaty, of course, but frequently as awkward and often difficult to get by.  The chief problem is that, although there’s books, classes and talks on the subject, all of them (including this one) will fall short of what you really need because it’s different for everyone and the only thing you have to compare against is your peers…for whom it’s entirely different.

So, if you’re anything like me, you stress yourself out.  You cringe when you hear other peoples’ good news, no matter how much you might have wished that good news for them.  Your neck tenses up when you look at your manuscript and wonder exactly what it is you’re doing with it.  You panic and run naked in the streets screaming “I’M DOING IT WRONG!  I’M DOING IT WRONG!

Eventually, you pass out.  You wake up on the floor of your office.  You find your trousers.  You sigh and crawl back up and you start writing again.

Because this is pretty much the only universal truth in writing: if you’re going to, then you will.

This is the sole constant of writing and the most-often underrated aspect.  You will use talent a lot in writing your book, in the initial spark, in the prose, in the narrative and voice.  You will use luck once or twice, in things that are largely out of your hands.  You will use persistence, perseverance and everything else that implies sitting down and doing it even if you don’t feel like it for absolutely everything else.

Because what other people do, what other people experience, what deals they make, what money they get, what followers they have, they’re going through the same stuff you are.  And if they weren’t, it wouldn’t matter.  Your writing moves the way it does.  You can nudge it along, you can try marketing techniques, you can try holding your breath and whistling Dixie if you think it’ll make your moustache grow quicker.  But the only way to succeed at being a writer is to write, no matter what else happens.

Because no one really knows what’s going to happen.  You can look to agents and publishers like they know, and they might have a better idea than you do, but ideas is ideas.  No one knows what will hit next, when it will hit, why it will hit.  No one knows what’s going to spend years writing, only to take off suddenly one day.  No one knows when you’re going to get hair on your body.  Certainly not you.  I wouldn’t advise asking your publishers, either.  They’ll be weirded out.

Has this helped the despair you may feel?  Probably not.  Will it ward against the despair you’ll feel in the future?  I can almost assure you it won’t.  Did this blog post solve all your problems?  Not a chance in hell.

Because, like puberty, it’s not a choice for a writer.  What else are you going to do?  No matter what the others are up to, you’ve still got to write.  Not for the editors, for the money, for the fame.  It’s just something you’re going to do.  Because you’re a writer.

Duh.

Ozymandias is still a jerk Read More »

Where Have All the Cow-Men Gone

From a long bout of abstinence from fantasy novels, I have returned.  Today, I am reading The Dragon’s Path by Daniel Abraham.  His other series, The Long Price Quartet, didn’t really work with me, since me am dumb fantasy reader.

It’s quite good.  His sense of focus doesn’t really jive with mine (which is something I’ll talk about later), but there’s a lot to praise here.  I haven’t seen quite as much as I’d like to for purposes of making a solid judgment, but there is one thing I’d like to talk about while it’s still fresh in my mind.

The Dragon’s Path takes place in a world of war and political intrigue, of fighting and carnage and, what I really liked, a world full of all kinds of different races living together.  Not always in harmony, mind, but they’re there and they’re raw.  It was about the time I saw the first unusual race that it struck me as to just how unusual this was.  Races other than human, defined by more than culture.  Honest to God alien, weird, scaly, furry, angry, jeweled weirdos walking alongside humanity.

It was then that another question struck me: exactly why did we give up unusual races in fantasy?  I guess there’s a few reasons, really.

Some authors are sparse with magic and with creatures in an effort to make them more impactful when they finally do show up.  If you think back to the old Conan stories, most of the wizards and sorcerers didn’t do a tremendous lot beyond making people poop themselves or lifting heavy objects as frail old men.  And yet, it was pretty intense when that happened, because no one else could do it and no one was really sure what it could do.  And, likewise, a hulking lizardman is a lot more scary if there’s only one of him, because you have no idea what he is, exactly, if he doesn’t have a tribe or culture.

But there’s a bigger reason.

The people who accuse fantasy of not being realistic are not exactly wrong and not exactly for the reasons you’re thinking of.  “Escapism,” as the word is so often used, usually carries with it the connotation of disingenuousness.  It’s not realistic, it’s not accurate and it’s not human.  Perhaps in an effort to shed that stereotype, we also shed the magic, the monsters and the races in favor of politics, intrigue and more things that all of us can relate to…like being thrown out a window for discovering a royal incestuous coup.

Who hasn’t that happened to?

I kid, of course.

These practices have worked well for the authors that use them, but I think we might have lost something in our abandonment of fantastic races.

As I said, the people who throw around escapism as equating to disingenuousness are not exactly wrong, but they’re not exactly right, either.  When you use fantasy races as cut-and-paste bad guys or nondescript ethereal beings of great wisdom, then yeah, you’re not really creating much beyond cannon fodder and/or plot devices.  But when you make a race more than just a name and a war cry, when you apply a culture, an attitude, a struggle and a history, you’re making a commentary on humanity, whether you intended to or not.

I’m not saying that anyone who writes a story in which orcs aren’t all that bad is qualified to give a seminar on race relations, but that story has put an idea out there.  It’s made a point that we can accept, refute or apply to our own lives.  And when that point is made, when it clicks for the reader, then the conflict from which that point came from is more easy to invest into, making a stronger story.

A strong culture behind an alien race = stronger identity = stronger point = deeper conflict = deeper reader involvement = stronger story.

If you do it right.

And while I make it pretty well known that I don’t really care about worldbuilding, I make an exception when it comes to alien races.  The reason being that I loathe when worldbuilding stands segregate from character development.  Creating the race and the culture integrates the two.  We are closer to the world because we are closer to the race because we are closer to the character of that race.  It’s an excellent way of investing the reader in the world without beating him over the head with an epic poem.

And finally…

You remember Star Wars, don’t you?  Remember the Tattooine Cantina?  Remember seeing all these weird, alien creatures hanging out together?  Remember what that felt like?

Wonder.

Awe.

“What the–”

That’s what fantasy is all about.

To me, anyway.  It might be something different to you.  But then, what do you think?  Do you prefer your books bundled with lizardmen or do you prefer a straight-up, no-nonsense human-filled romp?

Tell me.

Tell me everything.

Go read The Dragon’s Path.

Peace.

Where Have All the Cow-Men Gone Read More »

Sam Sykes Tells You How to Live

First, read this.

I admit, I pay more attention to the goings-on in YA than one might think.  A lot of that is because we tend to share the same tone and themes through our writing: triumphing over hardship and growing through adversity, embracing the fact that philosophy and ethics grow and wither instead of being set in stone, acceptance of the truth that bodily functions are usually hilarious.

Whatever the reason, I’ve often felt that YA and fantasy tend to have a kindred connection and that, in recent years, we’ve undergone transformations that are getting us closer together.  Both genres tend to be used as vehicles for human exploration, with YA serving as mostly a discovery of youth and fantasy serving as a discovery for everything else.  You can argue this if you like and maybe scratch your beards, possibly bring up the influence of Tolkien and the power of true myth.  Feel free to.  That’s not what we’re talking about here.

If you’ve been with the blog for a bit, you probably know my opinion of mainstream literature’s opinion of fantasy literature.  If not, let me summarize: who cares?  We’re not writing for them, we’re not trying to reach them, we’re not talking to them.  If they happen to find something in our work that they can relate to, then great.  If not, then it’s not really our concern as writers and readers of fantasy.

There’s a lot more to go into there, but I’ll end that particular thought by summarizing one of their usual cries against fantasy: it’s escapism.  It has no real value.  It does not relate to the human experience.

In more than a few ways, they’re actually right, and we’ve talked about them on this blog before.  The concept of Chosen Ones, prophecies, clean conflicts with neat endings, absolute good and evil, unquestioningly accepting a fate based on whether your mother was an elf or an orc.  Traditions.  Proud traditions.  But left as they are, unquestioned and unaltered, they move us further away from humanity.

Realism is overrated.  We’re not aiming for realism.  But we are aiming for honesty: honesty to humanity and honesty to the art.  This is the chief reason that I frequently rail against the status quo (the other reason being that I am consummate attention whore).

And yet, some people prefer that.  They like their orcs evil, their princesses in peril and their heroes to say no to tobacco and whores.  Admittedly, they can make a pretty good case against a trend in fantasy that everyone has to be grimy and gritty for the sake of being edgy (which is as dishonest as the other end of the spectrum, I feel).  I don’t blame them.  Some people read for the sake of comfort and that’s absolutely and utterly fine.  I’m not suggesting that there is only one way to write and if you dare enjoy your heroes and villains then you’re not hanging out in reality, maaaaan.

Rather, I’m suggesting that we need to avoid taking the comfort as canon and the tradition as unalterable.  Disliking, criticizing or outright not reading something uncomfortable is fine.  But denying it totally as a contribution to the work seems to be all too common.  And going even further than that, we seem to use it as an excuse to reject any part of humanity we find uncomfortable.  Hence why we often see a lack of non-straight, non-white non-male protagonists.

As evidenced by what happened in Ms. Verday’s story (you didn’t think I had a point, did you?  DID YOU?)

Admittedly, this is a subject I’ve grappled with for awhile.  For a long time, I was leaning toward the theory that it’s more honest to not put in a non-straight, non-white non-male protagonist in a story if you are a straight, white male.  After all, how could you be honest about an experience you’ve never had?  Then I realized that I write about suicidal people, religious xenophobes and schizophrenics without being any of those things.

And that’s why I’ve changed my opinion to “there is value in trying.”

I’m not going to say there’s no harm in trying.  You might completely fuck something up and be ridiculed and shamed for it.  You might be utterly rejected as a writer for it.  Yeah.  That sucks.  Rejection, though, is going to be ever-present in your life as a person.  I can tell you it doesn’t stop after you get published, either.

But if it’s what you want to do, you have to try.  Even if it goes against tradition.  Even if you’re worried you might screw it up.  Even if it runs the risk of someone proposing the same ultimatum to you that they did to Ms. Verday.

We should all strive to do the same, then, and do our best to stick to our guns.

There might be some decrying that a YA author is experiencing this sort of thing before we big bad adults are tackling the issue.  After all, we’ve been pretty aware of this as an issue in our genre for a while.  I see it more as an inspiration, though.  As I said, and it might still be just me, but there is a connection between YA and fantasy and I don’t think it’s a bad thing that we take cues from each other now and again.

I don’t think it’s a bad thing that we try something new.  I don’t think it’s a bad thing that we occasionally meet a stumbling block like Ms. Verday did.  I don’t think it’s a bad thing that we sometimes mess it up entirely.

I do think it’s a bad thing if we feel constrained in our writing.  I do think it’s a bad thing if the urge to be published overwhelms our urge to explore.  I do think it’s a bad thing if the fear that we might be ridiculed, rejected or loathed for what we honestly try keeps us from doing so.

Admittedly, it’s easier for me to suggest that getting published is not that big a deal, since I am.  But what I’m not is award-winning, best-selling or possessing any other honors that might or might not be helped by writing something more safe and traditional.  And I still believe what I’ve just written.

You might dismiss this blog post entirely on that basis, though.  Or you might just roll your eyes and see another Sam Sykes anti-establishment rant.  You might just decide that this particular call isn’t for you.

That’s fine.

Because, in a way, this is another anti-establishment rant and what I’m suggesting is not for everyone.  I never suggested it should be.  What I am suggesting is that there is always value in fearlessness, that a fear of rejection is as weak an emotion as a fear of something new, that there is always room to learn and you will only ever do so by actually trying.

Think less.

Do more.

Sam Sykes Tells You How to Live Read More »

Scroll to Top